DISCLAIMERS

contact us >>

Histomorphometry in Nerve Regeneration: Experimental Comparison Of Different Axon Counting Methods

Majid Rezaei, Audrey Crawford, Michael Annunziata, Carlos Ordenana, Lynn Orfahli, Brian Figueroa, Jerry Silver, Antonio Rampazzo, Bahar Bassiri Gharb
Case Western Reserve University - Cleveland Clinic
2019-02-15

Presenter: Lynn Orfahli

Affidavit:
I certify that the material proposed for presentation in this abstract has not been published in any scientific journal or previously presented at a major meeting.

Director Name: Bahar Bassiri Gharb, MD, PhD

Author Category: Medical Student
Presentation Category: Basic Science Research
Abstract Category: General Reconstruction

Background: Histomorphometry is the most common method to evaluate outcomes of peripheral nerve regeneration. It is simple to implement and provides a quantifiable, objective assessment. However, practical choice of measurement methods can remarkably affect results and there is no universally accepted method.

Methods: Digitized toluidine-stained slides of 34 rat sciatic nerves distal to a 20 mm nerve graft (5 mm proximal to trifurcation) were utilized. All myelinated axons in each nerve section were manually counted. Total axon counts were also extrapolated from manually- and software-counted (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, USA) sample nerve sections representing 20% of total area. Fiber (FD) and axon (AD) diameters, myelin thickness (MTh), and G-ratio were measured manually throughout.

Results: Total axon counts in the distal sciatic nerves were 12,503±4,195 with mean FD and MTh of 5.4±1.1 µm and 0.9±0.2 µm, respectively. Manual axon counts extrapolated from sampled nerve sections were significantly higher than the manual count of the entire section (13,819±4,688; p=0.000). Counts from both methods were highly correlated (r^2=0.936, p=0.000). ImageJ counts were also significantly different from total counts (p=0.005), but did not correlated with the total manual counts. FD, AD, and MTh were not different between groups (p=0.253, p=0.111, p=0.6).

Conclusion: Total manual axon count remains the most accurate method. Manual count of sampled nerve section can produce highly correlated, reliable counts when using standardized and systematic sampling methods.

Ohio,Pennsylvania,West Virginia,Indiana,Kentucky,Pennsylvania American Society of Plastic Surgeons

OVSPS Conference